These last few gorgeous days have tempted even the most
cynical Wisconsinites to believe that winter is finally over (for those that
remember last year, however, cynicism might still be fully present). But if you
don’t want to embrace the warmth like the myriad of college students in shorts
now (it’s still only 40 degrees, people) try introducing one or both of these “snowball”
activities that Dr. Sherrie Serros, Department of Mathematics, provides below:
Snowball fight: This activity enables students to anonymously
participate in a process-oriented problem and ensures 100% participation. I put
a couple of different solutions on the board that provide the same answers, but
structurally are very different. Students have to decide which one demonstrates
valid mathematics. If I were to just openly ask the class, I wouldn’t
necessarily get a lot of eager responses: student are often afraid to raise
their hand and assertively declare which one is right and which one is wrong. So instead, I have each of them take a slice
of paper on which they have to write out what solution they think is correct
and their reasoning behind it. Nobody else knows what they’ve written; I
instruct them not to write their names on the piece of paper. Then, they crumple
up the piece of paper into a little ball and throw it across the room. Students
then pick up whatever “snowball” is nearest to them and they read what it says.
In this way, I get to hear everyone’s thinking process and I can focus on the
misconceptions present in the classroom without ever putting a single student
on the spot. Additionally, when we do focus on the misconceptions, people can
hear that others had the same thoughts and feel that they were not alone.
Students really like this activity (who doesn’t like throwing snowballs?) and I
benefit by hearing everyone’s thought-process in the classroom.
Rolling Snowball: This
activity is useful when you want to generate a big idea based on a small core.
My example for this comes from my education classes when I want the students to
work on lesson design. I separate them into groups and start by providing them
with the content of the lesson, and then have each group add an additional
facet to the lesson (i.e. the diversity of learning styles, or the diversity of
learning abilities, or assessment). By the time we go around the room and
gather everyone’s contributions we have a big unit formed that addresses many
crucial facets of lesson design. The metaphor I use for this is that of a
snowball rolling down the hill because as each layer is added our lesson design
becomes bigger, more fleshed-out, and more involved.
Interview by: Jon Pumper
No comments:
Post a Comment